skip to Main Content


Nr: 502
Fach: MRÖ
Art: Pro-/Seminar
Semesterwochenstunden: 2
Dozenten: Flett
Verwendbarkeit: AM MRÖ, BM MRÖ, WB
Termin: Zeit: 14.15-16.00 Uhr Termine: dienstags und mittwochs
Ort: Raum 4

Die Veranstaltung findet in der Zeit vom 5.5.-14.6.18 statt


From its inception to the latter half of the 20th century, mission studies supported the practice of missions as conducted by the Western churches during the colonial period. The ending of colonial missions meant the ending of this framing impetus and the attendant methods used within mission studies. Missio Dei constituted a key theoretical advance, opening mission beyond the narrow scope of an activity of religious propagation conducted by the Western churches. Much attention has focused on this position’s theological significance. Less observed are the methodological consequences. Andreas Feldtkeller notes how mission studies now concentrates less on the human as object, and more on the relationship between God and the human subject. This focus opens mission studies to the range of methods dealing with this relationship. As one potential problem, mission studies loses its methodological cohesion, leading to problems of definition and of its identity as a field of investigation. A number of methodological challenges lie before contemporary mission studies methodological challenges as expressed by the shift in language from “missiology, ecumenics and the history of religion” to “leadership studies,” “world Christianity” or “intercultural theology.” Decisions about method includes questions of sources and authorities and shapes the content of the field. This pro-seminar considers the key issues and concerns informing mission studies today, and suggests key resources for when constructing theologies of mission.


Bediako, Kwame. “The Emergence of World Christianity and the Remaking of
Theology.” Journal of African Christian Thought 12, no. 2 (2009): 50–55;
Feldtkeller, Andreas. “Missionswissenschaft und Interkulturelle Theologie:
Eine Verhältnisbestimmung.” Theologische Literaturzeitung 138 (2013): 3–12;
Keum, Jooseop. “Together Towards Life: An Introduction to the New WCC
Mission Statement.” Svensk missionstidskrift 101, no. 3-4 (2013): 291–300;
Phan, Peter C. “A New Kind of Christianity, But What Kind?” Mission Studies
22, no. 1 (2005): 59–83; Phan, Peter C. “Religious Identity and Belonging
Amidst Diversity and Pluralism: Challenges and Opportunities for Church and
Theology,” In Passing on the Faith: Transforming Traditions for the Next
Generation of Jews, Christians, and Muslims, edited by James L. Heft, 162–
84. Fordham University Press, 2007; Ross, Kenneth R., Jooseop Keum,
Kyriaki Avtzi, and Roderick R. Hewitt, eds. Ecumenical Missiology: Changing
Landscapes and New Conceptions of Mission Oxford; Geneva: Regnum;
WCC, 2016; Sanneh, Lamin O. “World Christianity and the New
Historiography: Historical and Global Interconnections,” In Enlarging the Story:
Perspectives on Writing World Christian History, edited by Wilbert R. Shenk,
94–114. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2002; Sanneh, Lamin O. Translating the
Message: The Missionary Impact on Culture. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books,
2009; Together Towards Life: Mission and Evangelism in Changing
Landscapes. Commission on World Mission and Evangelism, 2013; Ustorf,
Werner. “The Cultural Origins of ‘Intercultural Theology’.” Mission Studies 25,
no. 2 (2008): 229–51; Walls, Andrew F. “Mission and Migration: The Diaspora
Factor in Christian History.” Journal of African Christian Thought 5, no. 2
(2002): 3–11; Wrogemann, Henning. “Dimensionen und Aufgaben des Faches
Interkulturelle Theologie / Missionswissenschaft im Kanon theologischer
Wissenschaft.” Evangelische Theologie 73 (2013): 437–49.




Als Proseminar 3 LP, als Seminar 4 LP

Back To Top
×Close search